From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 26 12:24:07 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3399EB;
 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A70F38;
 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102])
 by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDB0AB51;
 Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 1B9859A49; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:24:06 +0100 (CET)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Large Capsicum patch for review.
References: <20130213025547.GA2025@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <20130213230221.GB1375@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <20130223221116.GR1377@garage.freebsd.pl> <5129ADC5.5040306@gmx.de>
 <512A2CA0.2050509@gmx.de> <20130224235936.GX1377@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <512B3DBB.4080909@gmx.de> <20130225215004.GA1375@garage.freebsd.pl>
 <867glvbbjz.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20130226121345.GB1341@garage.freebsd.pl>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:24:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20130226121345.GB1341@garage.freebsd.pl> (Pawel Jakub Dawidek's
 message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:13:46 +0100")
Message-ID: <86y5eb9sbe.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Christoph Mallon <christoph.mallon@gmx.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:07 -0000

Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > > [...] I use int as a more CPU-friendly type [than size_t]
> > [...] size_t is equal to unsigned long on all platforms, so
> > "CPU-friendly" is not a valid argument.
> Is long more CPU-friendly than int?

No, but it isn't any *less* CPU-friendly either, so this is not a valid
argument for choosing unsigned int over size_t.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no