From owner-freebsd-commit  Wed Nov 29 08:39:32 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA29432
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:39:32 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA29406
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:39:20 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA29395
          for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:39:18 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA29380
          ; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:39:06 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA08339; Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:34:42 -0800
To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
Cc: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/config Makefile main.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 29 Nov 1995 11:03:50 EST."
             <9511291603.AA06038@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 08:34:42 -0800
Message-ID: <8337.817662882@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

You're saying to me that you believe the dependency information to be
updated properly by config, even when adding or deleting lines to the
config file?  E.g. it's possible for me to screw around with my config
file, re-run config and get a decent kernel out of what I build?

And please don't answer with some inane "the experienced user will
know when to blow away /sys/compile/<blah>" response since I already
*know* from bitter experience that this is most emphatically not the
case.


						Jordan

> <<On Tue, 28 Nov 1995 16:02:38 -0800, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com
> said:
> 
> > Sigh..  Now how much more convoluted does this have to get before
> > we fix the underlying problem?
> 
> I don't know, since I don't believe that there /is/ an underlying
> problem.
> 
> -GAWollman
> 
> --
> Garrett A. Wollman   | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... 
> wollman@lcs.mit.edu  | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance