From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Feb 12 11:22:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DEC3F9B for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:22:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from shadow.blackdawn.com (postfix@[209.69.196.108]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA39545; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 11:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by shadow.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 048F71A30; Sat, 12 Feb 2000 14:22:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 14:22:32 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Message-ID: <20000212142232.B14775@shadow.blackdawn.com> References: <20000209215806.M99353@abc.123.org> <20000209210106.A14617@moe.htfdw1.ct.home.com> <00021212385600.02144@localhost.localdomain> <20000212111504.N5570@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000212111504.N5570@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.ORG on Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 11:15:04AM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 11:15:04AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > *IF* people were to take this to ports@freebsd.org, they would have > learned there was a discussion about a month ago in which the conclusion > was to use one dir per port, but remove the subdirs w/in each ports > subdir. I haven't heard anything from Satoshi about this being in stone, so you aren't entirely correct.. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message