From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 6 17:49:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E031637B401; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D13A43F3F; Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:49:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with SMTP id <200306070049550510084o3re>; Sat, 7 Jun 2003 00:49:55 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 17:49:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030606174848.R15459@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Paul Robinson cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Way forward with BIND 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 00:49:57 -0000 On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr. wrote: > I seem to remember that part of the issue is that FreeBSD pulls in the > resolver libraries from BIND. Only indirectly. The resolver code actually hasn't been updated in a while, unfortunately. > I actually would like to see BIND completely excised from the base system. > However, every time I look at the amount of work required to break the > dependence between the resolver library and BIND, I generally realize that > there is something else I'd much rather be doing. ;) Yes, you have a lot of company in your "looking the other way'edness." :) -- This .signature sanitized for your protection