From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 09:39:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE412106566B; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472AC8FC0A; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so5173707bkc.13 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9jTj0QloFWXwPoFgePt81Q/Le2JXQ7pDvA55kT/2NUc=; b=qGJZHYwd9vmibo5/awe6ePBXyLG8mc4yqOe4NYTGfa/Ch9glithoHBM3CLnnJsMj09 +mLQ1xzJcnqRvBoZg5p3diDU/rU+rkXcwm6NHSBIE85tbKxvF9x5DkqIdE3hTBDt4Neq HYVpwj12FCcsWvqeAhPHuwD83zkTdDt0AMRe2B5sW9wacR3fZrFQ6pXC2zKepUJwiXta 8PBVJeQfrl+NyXK1xXYBwe4GI/PxbrhdQypCK0nsqJ759SZenut5H04jRzYoyOSJOpb/ ZN0fSQ3H7s6PT7tgIbWt5itQiNirpTyDBmFbRAQPhPYEkmsKRg9KJfpkMrdt3yeBPO/B qBbQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.128.65 with SMTP id j1mr4443367bks.74.1334050775156; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:39:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F83FE52.5010501@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F83F893.7040500@FreeBSD.org> <20120410091619.GS66606@droso.net> <4F83FE52.5010501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:35 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Michael Scheidell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .if ARCH / BROKEN, or 'NOT_FOR_ARCH'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:39:37 -0000 On 10 Apr 2012 10:33, "Michael Scheidell" wrote: > > > > On 4/10/12 5:16 AM, Erwin Lansing wrote: >> >> maintainer that something is wrong. >> >> There are quite a few large grey areas between those, but that's the >> general outline. > > so, if the maintainer knows something, and knows it won't ever get fixed, then 'NOT_FOR_ARCHS' is best, > if its an unknown/ maybe osversion, something the maintainer didn't know about, portmgr might mark it broken wrapped in a .if ${ARCH}. > > Yes. Bsd.port.options.mk is required beforehand of course. Chris