From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Nov 19 3:33:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (mg128-012.ricochet.net [204.179.128.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818E237B479; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 03:33:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA03153; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 03:33:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200011191133.DAA03153@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 03:33:15 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: Good BSD press in feedmag To: des@ofug.org Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 16 Nov, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > "The underground's latest heroes are the directors of software > projects based on 4.4 BSD Lite, the free operating system pioneered at > the University of California at Berkeley in the late 1970s. The gratis > software churned out by projects like FreeBSD and OpenBSD is > inarguably superior to most mainstream Linux distributions, both in > terms of security and portability." > I read the article, as much as I could stand. While the article is about DefCon and takes more time to illustrate Theo De Raadt as a hacker, it's difficult to read. Mostly it seems from the authors need to educate us on large words that barely fit into the article. That and run-on sentences and scretching the grammer where barely plausible. I guess I should be the last to speak as sometime my rant extend into nothing-ness. Hence, read this after at least a good cup of coffee or a six-pack of Jolt. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message