Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:57:29 +0200
From:      Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Unhappy Adobe Customer <bsd_appliance@yahoo.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SSSCA?
Message-ID:  <20011010195728.E83192@lpt.ens.fr>
In-Reply-To: <3BC48B9F.F385BFC7@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:55:43AM -0700
References:  <20011008193423.77229.qmail@web11901.mail.yahoo.com> <3BC34784.4D56D9DF@mindspring.com> <xzplmikcop2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3BC404A6.89276494@mindspring.com> <xzphet7dgra.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3BC410E4.ACF8074B@mindspring.com> <20011010113341.G57921@lpt.ens.fr> <3BC48B9F.F385BFC7@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert said on Oct 10, 2001 at 10:55:43:
> Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> > > ex = (prep. + abl.) out of, from within, from / on account of
> > > post = (+ acc.) after, behind
> >   ^^^^
> > 
> > Exactly.  You left out the t.
> 
> And you left out the definition of "factum", and the
> conjugation of it to "facto".

Your point being?  Do you claim that "post" is modified to "pos"?  
And in that case, since "post" means "after" or "behind", exactly 
why should "i pos facto" mean "before the fact"?

R

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011010195728.E83192>