From nobody Mon Aug 14 17:52:45 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RPhnZ1dJfz4Tmv9 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4RPhnY1jRKz4D7R for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 17:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from void@f-m.fm) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=f-m.fm header.s=fm1 header.b=HZ5Gys5V; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm1 header.b=j+0j2atE; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of void@f-m.fm designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=void@f-m.fm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=f-m.fm Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293CE5C00CE for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:52:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:52:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=f-m.fm; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1692035568; x=1692121968; bh=b/UEyIKCYeSSR8+Ig+yWrMHa/ r9O2b6iSmeRSSjoNK4=; b=HZ5Gys5VltccnyUl7W7ERkyupfzny8lDXThOXx1VB nBe77OAazcyE9zE++NQk6Z6LG50M02UTIyWLBW3Dmvh9efa0xwug/BMYiBJUJK75 SWijLZC3kJaCvCu/0VlpzsYDKX+1BWxB+6bUrniJYFDtKsKUlGLKj1BhpZLXVhl4 ajz7pgGvrjTKoqvwx2HQytszOr8pJ6KgB3ChkVWf2An4B0t2j/WvL6e4UApcypSn 3iLsJDKMhhjP19YMa01sYBfMNRHatkhNPc+d9C0tilizvys8PqEbgULscsgmX+0V +XkaQvBSDUIXUzp1hQuqqdSI69hvryol9FWCuDzs+emSQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1692035568; x=1692121968; bh=b/UEyIKCYeSSR8+Ig+yWrMHa/r9O2b6iSme RSSjoNK4=; b=j+0j2atEeormmgYocY/JRRz7OeBlpD7JjTbMpaMV5ZPptPLxXnL M/vrPIbAQWVTAsfCVYKFe4N2o0heU1AZbneB8kIpAHA6WREdLa2LWe98zEtXQU3Z cRD9L3qrmE+Nm3AVxJdsYl6mZlT5u0tICbOxu7Xyd0CKRN49uh4X3XmFDWxsphZp ULAxzY2N8IfT8AP1OYsLQuqLp0aL7Y0ohvg8+LIQbVgCJJg1jCa+15uBfKI7OVX6 WqtipUcEIHrmA+l4et1N6FLjd2Yn5MxQgSJciYH/Rpawbuz728zigmQH9bxcutAj 9cz0yvgvTlspl3IpUn9IuJAOH2HpYtUlHng== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedruddtgedguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggusehttdertd dttddvnecuhfhrohhmpehvohhiugcuoehvohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhmqeenucggtffrrght thgvrhhnpeevudffiedvffffgffhgeefjeefffdtieetheetkeefhfdvfefgtedtueehge ffueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehv ohhiugesfhdqmhdrfhhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i2541463c:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:52:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:52:45 +0100 From: void To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: zfs on ssd Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.88 / 15.00]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[messagingengine.com:dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[f-m.fm,none]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_EXCELLENT(-0.40)[66.111.4.29:from]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[f-m.fm:s=fm1,messagingengine.com:s=fm1]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.11)[0.107]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[66.111.4.29:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19151, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[f-m.fm:+,messagingengine.com:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[f-m.fm]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-fs@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[] X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4RPhnY1jRKz4D7R Hello list, I'd like to zpool 2x different size ssds into a single (non-redundant) pool. One is nearly 2Tb the other is nearly 4Tb. Will this work without performance penalty? I'm hoping that, because it'll be a non-redundant stripe, it'd work as expected without issue. The contest here is -current. Right now each ssd is its own zpool --