Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:54:44 +0500 From: Yar Odin <yarodin@gmail.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, peter@vereshagin.org, gabor@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Anton Berezin <tobez@tobez.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www Makefile ports/www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <200801132254.45535.yarodin@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080111004844.GA80974@FreeBSD.org> References: <200712310028.lBV0S5On056424@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080110223255.GA13357@heechee.tobez.org> <20080111004844.GA80974@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:32:55PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:41:26PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:00:27PM +0100, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:40:41PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 12:28:05AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > > Why this ever got added? There is an identical port > > > > > www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager. Now we are getting PRs with updates to > > > > > this one (see 119300), where PR authors *complain* about someone > > > > > updating "the wrong port", refering to gabor's update of > > > > > www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager recently... > > > > > > > > > > What a mess. I'd like committers adding new ports to be a *bit* > > > > > more careful and verify that the port is indeed *new*. > > > > > > > > > > It can be argued that the "new" name is better that the "old" one, > > > > > but this is an entirely separate can of worm. Grrrr. > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > After a discussion with tobez on irc, we have made plans to remove > > > > www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager after the slush. The new Port make more > > > > sense and have a Maintainer. > > > > > > As a side note: doesn't `FastCGI' look as a better name? We already > > > have `www/p5-FastCGI' and `www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager', and only one > > > `www/p5-FCGI-Async'. Maybe the latter should just be repocopied to > > > match the former ones? > > > > The problem here is that the actual module on CPAN is named FCGI. > > Gratuitously changing original name of software is something > > that we are trying to avoid historically, even if the original > > software breaks some other naming conventions by itself (a good > > example here would be p5-CGI.pm, which is called "CGI.pm" on CPAN, > > unlike the vast majority of CPAN content). > > > > In an ideal world, this would have been caught 3 years ago, and we would > > not be having this conversation. > > Fair enough; in fact, I was suspecting something like this. > > ./danfe It's very interesting and very usefull disscussion of course. BUT! Is somebody will fix it? I'm wrote PR with simplest issue of this problem more than a week ago - http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=119299
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801132254.45535.yarodin>