From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 15 09:30:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443BB10656A5 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD1E8FC13 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1F9U7pK082645 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:30:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1F9U7xj082640; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:30:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:30:07 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201002150930.o1F9U7xj082640@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24231065670; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:22:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0B08FC15; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1F9MBXe082316; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:22:11 GMT (envelope-from dougb@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from dougb@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o1F9MBui082315; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:22:11 GMT (envelope-from dougb) Message-Id: <201002150922.o1F9MBui082315@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:22:11 GMT From: Doug Barton To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/143948: repo-copy requests in net-p2p X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Doug Barton List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:30:08 -0000 >Number: 143948 >Category: ports >Synopsis: repo-copy requests in net-p2p >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Feb 15 09:30:07 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Doug Barton >Release: FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 i386 >Organization: AAAG >Environment: DNA >Description: repo-copy requests in net-p2p >How-To-Repeat: Per the recent discussion in -ports regarding the rblibtorrent ports I'm submitting the following requests, all in ports/net-p2p: 1. copy rblibtorrent-devel to libtorrent-rasterbar-14 2. copy qbittorrent to qbittorrent-22 In addition to those two I plan to introduce libtorrent-rasterbar-15 which will initially have a -devel suffix (as will qbittorrent-22). The port for the 0.15 version is much simpler than the 0.14 version and shares little in common, which is why I'm not suggesting a repocopy, although if you want to do one anyway I won't argue. :) I have already added deprecated/expiration to rblibtorrent and sharktorrent. Rationale: The name change is to reflect the actual name of the project, make the ports simpler, etc. After libtorrent-rasterbar 0.15 is released there will be 2 "stable" versions active (similar to how we have 6.x, 7.x, and 8.x). The qbittorrent ports that depend on this library can make use of either version, however I'm not sure about the other consumers of the 0.14.x version (currently rblibtorrent-devel). Therefore it will be necessary to maintain both versions in the tree for some period of time. There will also likely be a 0.16 devel version at some point not too long after 0.15 is released. For qbittorrent the development model seems to be to move the "beta" version into release status, then immediately roll out the new beta. Tagging the directory name will make rolling the stable/devel versions easier in the future without requiring more repocopies. >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: