From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 20:16:16 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7840E16A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from nagual.nl (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.10.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD8B13C44B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from westmark.nagual.nl (westmark.nagual.nl [192.168.11.22]) by nagual.nl (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/yanta) with ESMTP id l5FKIK6f020775 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dick@localhost) by westmark.nagual.nl (8.14.1+Sun/8.14.1/Submit) id l5FKG9og014837; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:16:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: westmark.nagual.nl: dick set sender to dick@nagual.nl using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> From: Dick Hoogendijk Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 22:16:09 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> (Wojciech Puchar's message of "Fri\, 15 Jun 2007 21\:49\:14 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.11.35 Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:16:16 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: >>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. >>> >> Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using >> ZFS for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a > > if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) > partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest. http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/ zfs _is_ nice but bear in mind it is still in development. There are issues. But overall it might become a very important FS. Even booting off zfs became available. -- Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ http://nagual.nl/ + Solaris 11 05/07 ++