From owner-cvs-sbin  Fri May 12 13:30:07 1995
Return-Path: cvs-sbin-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA21291
          for cvs-sbin-outgoing; Fri, 12 May 1995 13:30:07 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA21267
          ; Fri, 12 May 1995 13:29:55 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id NAA10131; Fri, 12 May 1995 13:32:55 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id NAA00287; Fri, 12 May 1995 13:29:54 -0700
Message-Id: <199505122029.NAA00287@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com>
cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes), wollman@freefall.cdrom.com,
        CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-sbin@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/dumpon Makefile dumpon.8 dumpon.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 May 95 12:26:07 PDT."
             <199505121926.MAA05134@ref.tfs.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Fri, 12 May 1995 13:29:53 -0700
Sender: cvs-sbin-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>> > wollman     95/05/12 12:10:10
>> > 
>> >   Added:       sbin/dumpon  Makefile dumpon.8 dumpon.c
>> >   Log:
>> >   My utility to specify where you want crash dumps to go.  More user
>> >   and kernel support to follow.
>> 
>> 4)  There should be *no* code imports, or functionality added to any place
>>     in the source tree.  Also just because you have some time before this
>>     goes into effect does not mean you should try to cram things in the
>>     tree now just so you can bug fix it after May 13th.  Anyone doing this
>>     will be slammed around for doing it.
>> 
>> 
>> I asked for a coasting down, not a ramping up.  Sorry, your to late,
>> expect this to disappear into the Attic until after 2.0.5 is cut.
>
>I vote for this change to stay.  It is a lot cleaner that what we have.

   What's done is done. Please leave the changes in there....but I do ask for
people to be thinking "we want to release 2.0.5 soon - this can wait for 2.1".

-DG