From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 25 01:41:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D261065670 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C8D8FC14 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@telenix.org) Received: (qmail 18382 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2009 01:41:55 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (HELO april.telenix.org) (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 25 Mar 2009 01:41:55 -0000 Message-ID: <49C98BE1.6050906@telenix.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:41:53 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt donovan References: <49C9256C.2040900@telenix.org> <200903242202.28054.marco.broeder@gmx.eu> <49C954F0.8050803@FreeBSD.org> <200903242322.18533.marco.broeder@gmx.eu> <28283d910903241611n695018e9g934acf921f15dda3@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28283d910903241611n695018e9g934acf921f15dda3@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=F3DCA0E9; url=http://pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sticky Bit , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Doug Barton Subject: Re: qt4 ports descriptions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:41:56 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 matt donovan wrote: > > Chuck is more complaining about the QT4 ports descriptions since he does > not get it that all of it is required to program in QT4. so of course it > will all have the same description since it all comes from one tarball > think freebsd just breaks some of it up though but I could be wrong > Well, let me offer an example: qt4-core versus qt4-qtdemo. They are very, very different ports, but they have precisely the same descriptions. Is this correct, from your viewpoint?? I did a find for all pkgs starting with qt4, and found they all have the same descriptions. Seeing as just how different they are (most certainly from a user perspective), it seems easily justifiable to require different descr strings, most certainly given the small work involved. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknJi+EACgkQz62J6PPcoOneugCgl+lFgZzBliebkEtfMJE+fOJV EwEAoJw4nyBCaTeqsZ2X2NUtexwEzJDb =G15G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----