From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 24 00:30:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA08837 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 00:30:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from frontier.netnology.com.au (frontier.netnology.com.au [203.33.30.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA08800 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 00:30:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from craig@hotmix.com.au) Received: from superbruce (superbruce.netnology.com.au [203.33.30.10]) by frontier.netnology.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA18231 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 15:37:36 +0800 From: Craig Beasland To: Subject: RE: NT vs FreeBSD Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 15:33:33 +0800 Message-ID: <002e01bdcf31$1b3f6ad0$0a1e21cb@superbruce.hotmix.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 In-reply-to: <19980821141844.16052.qmail@wolf.com> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I seem to be misunderstood, my preference would be to use BSD for everything. It supports, dial-in users, file and printer sharing and all the Internet stuff as well all with much lower overheads and older hardware. However, a person coming from a completely MS background would have a hard time getting BSD working with a web server. Just the partitioning and labelling of the drives seems to get most people. Point and click might not be the best, but it sure is easy. Also, a well built NT box is more secure than a poorly built BSD one - wouldn't you agree. Cheers Craig To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message