From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 21 03:04:48 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id DAA24706 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 03:04:48 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA24670 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 03:04:35 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id DAA06985; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 03:04:11 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id DAA00856; Tue, 21 Feb 1995 03:04:11 -0800 Message-Id: <199502211104.DAA00856@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Andras Olah cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Library version policy (was: tcpdump 3.0?) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 21 Feb 95 10:02:34 +0100." <6497.793357354@utis156> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Tue, 21 Feb 1995 03:04:09 -0800 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >I'm afraid I'm asking for trouble! ;-) So far I've got the >following possibilities for the version number of libpcap: > >1) We've got libpcap v0.0pl3 from ftp.ee.lbl.gov in our tree. >2) When installed it defaults to libpcap.so.2.0 (current situation) >3) Garrett proposed 1.1 >4) Rod voted for 2.4 > >Andras (newbie committer) I think you should just bump the version to 2.1. Anything else is just asking for trouble. -DG