From owner-freebsd-security  Tue Dec 17 00:59:59 1996
Return-Path: <owner-security>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id AAA09523
          for security-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:59:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from narcissus.ml.org (brosenga.st.pitzer.edu [134.173.120.201])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id AAA09511
          for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:59:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ben@localhost) by narcissus.ml.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA01249; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:59:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 00:59:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Snob Art Genre <ben@narcissus.ml.org>
To: Victor Rotanov <vitjok@fasts.com>
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: sendmail...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961217102339.5647B-100000@server.fasts.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961217005838.1244A-100000@narcissus.ml.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 17 Dec 1996, Victor Rotanov wrote:

> 
> Hello.
> 
> Why sendmail can't be replaced with something more secure by default?
> I'd suggest Zmailer which can be fount at 
> ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/unix/mail/zmailer
> It is also seems to be faster than sendmail on high loads.

Oh god, don't get the religious wars going again, *please*.

> 
> Thanks, bye.
> 					vitjok
> 
> 



 Ben

The views expressed above are not those of the Worker's Compensation 
Board of Queensland, Australia.