From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 01:12:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37831106566C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B838FC1C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 01:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p511C4Mr001830; Tue, 31 May 2011 20:12:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 20:12:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Jeremy Chadwick In-Reply-To: <20110601005219.GA11776@icarus.home.lan> Message-ID: References: <20110601005219.GA11776@icarus.home.lan> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Tue, 31 May 2011 20:12:04 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Storing revisions of large files using ZFS snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:12:06 -0000 On Tue, 31 May 2011, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > We've found that in most cases, a user will overwrite or rm a file which > they didn't mean to and wish to restore just that file. They need to do > so quickly and easily. ZFS and UFS snapshots don't make this easy for > them to accomplish (ZFS is easier than UFS in this regard, absolutely). It seems easy enough to restore the file from .zfs/snapshot. If users find this too difficult, then a small shell script or GUI program can make it easy. The main annoyance with restoring the file from .zfs/snapshot is that restoring the files in this way may consume more disk space. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/