From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 21 15:34:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA12437B401; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:34:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from angelica.unixdaemons.com (angelica.unixdaemons.com [209.148.64.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9AD43ED8; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 15:34:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hiten@angelica.unixdaemons.com) Received: from angelica.unixdaemons.com (hiten@localhost.unixdaemons.com [127.0.0.1]) by angelica.unixdaemons.com (8.12.6/8.12.1) with ESMTP id gBLNYPsB034950; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:34:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (from hiten@localhost) by angelica.unixdaemons.com (8.12.6/8.12.1/Submit) id gBLNYOJW034949; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:34:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from hiten) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:34:24 -0500 From: Hiten Pandya To: Dan Lukes Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VLAN v.s. NIC with VLAN hardware support bug. Message-ID: <20021221233424.GA23657@unixdaemons.com> References: <3E038A1A.6070203@obluda.cz> <3E03A86C.6D15F650@newsguy.com> <3E03C706.5060508@obluda.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E03C706.5060508@obluda.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD i386 X-Public-Key: http://www.pittgoth.com/~hiten/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten X-PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=Hiten+Pandya&op=index Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 02:42:30AM +0100, Dan Lukes wrote the words in effect of: > IFAIK no. I tried it also during debug of my problem. But it doesn't > support 1000BaseTX, so it isn't decision for my purpose. > > The only cards with HW vlan support on STABLE are nge, bge, txp, gx, > em, ti (ti aren't affected by reported bug as it strips the priority > bits at driver level). Dan, I believe you submitted a PR about this [1], what does patch try to solve, regarding VLAN hardware support? [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/46405 Cheers. -- Hiten Pandya (hiten@unixdaemons.com, hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org) http://www.unixdaemons.com/~hiten/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message