From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 17:58:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F0516A4CE for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:58:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao04.cox.net (lakemtao04.cox.net [68.1.17.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178D143D09 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:58:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eqe@cox.net) Received: from merlin ([68.110.209.157]) by lakemtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031211015839.YKIW19895.lakemtao04.cox.net@merlin>; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:58:39 -0500 From: eqe@cox.net Organization: Dark Ronin To: cpghost@cordula.ws Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:59:51 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net> <20031210054413.GA58841@just.puresimplicity.net> <200312101113.hBABDdo7066348@fw.farid-hajji.net> In-Reply-To: <200312101113.hBABDdo7066348@fw.farid-hajji.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200312102059.51118.eqe@cox.net> cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why support alpha?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 01:58:41 -0000 On Wednesday 10 December 2003 06:13, you wrote: > > > Isn't alpha dead? Why bother supporting them in 5.2 it seems like > > > wasted energy. Yes people still use it but for them there is 4.9 which > > > works fine. You could better serve the freebsd community by focusing on > > > the > > > > No, there's not a lot of future left for the architecture. The writing is > > on the wall, but some would say the same thing for sun4u. However, > > there's still lots of Alpha users running FreeBSD (as evidenced by this > > list) and the continuing Alpha development for FreeBSD. > > Supporting as many architectures as possible is always good > for overall code portability, and therefore code quality. yes, yes, I get it and agree, thx