From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Fri Nov 24 20:49:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0955DF10FD for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (unknown [IPv6:2620:64:0:1:223:7dff:fea2:c8f2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E5B63F75 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:49:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D642AA335; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:43:15 -0700 (MST) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2446E39813; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:49:52 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 15:49:52 -0500 From: Diane Bruce To: "A. Wilcox" Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) Message-ID: <20171124204952.GA1497@night.db.net> References: <20171123152615.GA35498@rdtc.ru> <201711241647.vAOGlgxu071487@fire.js.berklix.net> <5A1883CA.3090409@Wilcox-Tech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5A1883CA.3090409@Wilcox-Tech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 20:49:56 -0000 On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 02:40:42PM -0600, A. Wilcox wrote: > On 24/11/17 13:19, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > hi, > > > > Pardon me, but it's 2017 and the 4.3BSD system index isn't an immutable bible. > > > > As a general push to packaging things in general, turning fortune into > > a package seems like some low hanging fruit. > > > > > > > > -adrian > > > This, so much this. Why is it so controversial to put the thing in a > package? Why do people want so badly to just remove it? Why wasn't it > discussed about putting it in a package? Let's bring back badblocks too while we are at it. > > It seems like if, instead of *deleting* things, they were just moved to > packages, probably nobody would have complained. Or at least, it would > have been fewer people (I wouldn't have), and the complaints would have > been lighter ("you could have told me" vs "how dare you"). > > Live and learn. And please, package it. ALL of it. Yes. Please. > > --arw > > -- > A. Wilcox (awilfox) > Open-source programmer (C, C++, Python) > https://code.foxkit.us/u/awilfox/ > Diane Bruce -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db