From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Jun 26 1:30:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF39237BA78 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 01:30:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA00315; Mon, 26 Jun 2000 10:30:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp -o xxx References: <200006260434.WAA16059@harmony.village.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 26 Jun 2000 10:30:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: Warner Losh's message of "Sun, 25 Jun 2000 22:34:24 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh writes: > fetch supports using -o to secify the output filename. However, ftp > doesn't. Since fetch won't work with socks, I've been using ftp for > all my fetching needs with ports for the past several years. Now, > I've run into snag. Some ports fetch stuff into subdirectories using > -o, so I was thinking of adding this to ftp. Comments? Wouldn't it be better to add socks support to fetch(1)? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message