From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 12:50:46 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA08655 for java-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:50:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au (cimlog.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.51.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA08650 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 12:50:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jb@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au) Received: (from jb@localhost) by freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA12885; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 07:55:29 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jb) From: John Birrell Message-Id: <199801072055.HAA12885@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> Subject: Re: Motif question In-Reply-To: <199801072017.NAA25630@dnstoo.consys.com> from "Russell L. Carter" at "Jan 7, 98 01:17:09 pm" To: rcarter@consys.com (Russell L. Carter) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 07:55:28 +1100 (EST) Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Russell L. Carter wrote: > Everything sounds fine, I haven't been paying close attention, > is access to the jdk sources by a company just contingent on > signing and sending off the license (and waiting?) Yes, provided that the company fills out (and intends to obey) the non-commercial license. That is what my company did. I did get one email later from someone in Sun (in Singapore) querying what my company was doing, but this was after they had approved the license. Seems like a sensible approach on their part. They just allowed me to upgrade to the 1.1.5 sources under the existing license (which was approved less than a year ago). Regards, -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@netbsd.org; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137