From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Jun 26 13:55:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA29292 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 13:55:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from proxy4.ba.best.com (root@proxy4.ba.best.com [206.184.139.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA29184 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 13:55:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Kurt@Boolean.Net) Received: from gypsy (mg128-241.ricochet.net [204.179.128.241]) by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.8.8/8.8.BEST) with SMTP id NAA21019 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 1998 13:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806262053.NAA21019@proxy4.ba.best.com> X-Sender: boolean@shell17.ba.best.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 13:44:00 -0700 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" Subject: Colocation facility in SFbay Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Folks, I'm looking at colocation facilities in the SF Bay Area (SF to SJ). My basic needs: Affordable low charge per server/space/environment reasonable bandwidth charges reliable, well connected provider Growth ability could mushroom (I hope :-) Initially, I am talking about only 2 servers initially, with additional 2 within 3 months. Might fit into one rack. Looking at starting at lowest bandwidth rung and climbing up as needed. The low per server charge is important as we're planning on using many small servers (instead of a few huge beasts). Looking for recommendations, suggestions, horror stories, etc.? Thanks, Kurt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message