From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Sep 9 13:25:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA17022 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 13:25:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA17017 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 13:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA01555; Mon, 9 Sep 1996 13:23:55 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199609092023.NAA01555@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Intel XXpress - some SMP benchmarks To: peter@spinner.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 1996 13:23:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: rv@groa.uct.ac.za, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199609091043.SAA08111@spinner.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Sep 9, 96 06:43:58 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The "kernel proper" lock > could probably then have the vfs and perhaps vm split off into seperate > locks or locking strategies. (and if somebody starts spouting jargon from > his graph-theory book, that I for one don't understand a word of, I'll > scream. :-) How about Clifford algebras or set theory instead? 8-) 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.