From owner-cvs-all Sat Sep 4 2:56:24 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (dynamic-27.max1-du-ws.dialnetwork.pavilion.co.uk [212.74.8.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201761518A; Sat, 4 Sep 1999 02:56:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA07908; Sat, 4 Sep 1999 10:54:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@lan.awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA69820; Sat, 4 Sep 1999 10:58:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199909040958.KAA69820@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Matthew N. Dodd" Cc: Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/ppp bundle.c cbcp.c chap.c command.c fsm.c hdlc.h ip.c ipcp.c ipcp.h link.c link.h lqr.c mp.c pap.c ppp.8 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Sep 1999 20:47:12 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 04 Sep 1999 10:58:57 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > Why not use the IP TOS field? Packets already go into the priority queue if ip_tos is IPTOS_LOWDELAY. In fact, I'm considering making 4 queues so that having a priority port and IPTOS_LOWDELAY prioritises the packet over packets that have only one of these characteristics. > On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Brian Somers wrote: > > brian 1999/09/03 17:00:23 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > usr.sbin/ppp bundle.c cbcp.c chap.c command.c fsm.c > > hdlc.h ip.c ipcp.c ipcp.h link.c link.h > > lqr.c mp.c pap.c ppp.8 > > Log: > > o Split the two IPCP queues into three - one for FSM data > > (LCP/CCP/IPCP), one for urgent IP traffic and one for > > everything else. > > o Add the ``set urgent'' command for adjusting the list of > > urgent port numbers. The default urgent ports are 21, 22, > > 23, 513, 514, 543 and 544 (Ports 80 and 81 have been > > removed from the default priority list). > > o Increase the buffered packet threshold from 20 to 30. > > o Report the number of packets in the IP output queue and the > > list of urgent ports under ``show ipcp''. [.....] > -- > | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | > | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | > | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message