From owner-freebsd-net Tue Mar 4 14:24:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3696A37B401; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:24:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (silver.he.iki.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B8343FB1; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:24:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from PHE (silver.he.iki.fi [193.64.42.241]) by silver.he.iki.fi (8.12.8/8.11.4) with SMTP id h24MOSlL013809; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:24:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Message-ID: <0e1b01c2e29c$d1fefdc0$932a40c1@PHE> From: "Petri Helenius" To: "Bosko Milekic" Cc: , References: <0ded01c2e295$cbef0940$932a40c1@PHE> <20030304164449.A10136@unixdaemons.com> Subject: Re: mbuf cache Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 00:24:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Yes, it's normal. The commit log clearly states that the new > watermarks do nothing for now. I have a patch that changes that but I > haven't committed it yet because I left for vacation last Sunday and I > only returned early this Monday. Since then, I've been too busy to > clean up and commit it. In about a week or so you should notice a > difference. > Any comments on the high cpu consumption of mb_free? Or any other places where I should look to improve performance? Pete To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message