From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 13:27:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5AB16A41F for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:27:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from haven.freebsd.dk (haven.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A9D43D55 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:27:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.48.2]) by haven.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4636CBC66; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:27:15 +0000 (UTC) To: Omer Faruk Sen From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:20:34 +0300." <20050826132035.8496.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:27:14 +0200 Message-ID: <696.1125062834@phk.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cuaa0 or cuad0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 13:27:18 -0000 In message <20050826132035.8496.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org>, Omer Faruk Sen writes: >Hi, > >I want to make a remote debugging system but in: >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneld >ebug-online-gdb.html >it says we have to use cuaa0 but in FreeBSD6 there is no cuaa0 instead we >have cuad0. I think I should use cuad0 right? yes. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.