Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 16:49:41 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, steve@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: erlang port -- a poster child (Re: I'll be rolling a 4.1.1 r Message-ID: <20000920164941.A3105@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <200009201439.e8KEdli71369@aldan.algebra.com>; from mi@aldan.algebra.com on Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 10:39:06AM -0400 References: <XFMail.000920031025.andrew@cream.org> <200009201439.e8KEdli71369@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Gad, what a Cc list. Steve added, some trimmed. ] > =* If you are the MAINTAINER of a piece of code (or more likely a port) > =and don't have commit privs, put "MAINTAINER update" in the synopsis, > =for the same reasons as before. > > Use of synopsis for this worries me. Perhaps, this warrants two > new classes: ``update'' and ``maintainer-update'' in addition to the > all-including ``change-request''? I think synopsis is fine, but I like your suggestion. Steve, is this possible or sufficiently easy? Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000920164941.A3105>