From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 14:07:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45CD16A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mclone@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212DF43D5E for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mclone@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id b11so90629rne for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CVQ7EQTmoSVVH6CcGCCmtOOpWG7OVYL3pAUel79veynuJ9rvDd7OXwcTkXfxg/6CIuGoAWXWtxLPQIrvoFKYlifAKy/kQxUsGlwXiu5wS+UVCooPifpBPyMRslOo8ukGN6uHf/SMqHeq1rHqy6rALL5jpjVf+raGH6E7eJ/yfBU= Received: by 10.11.88.29 with SMTP id l29mr59771cwb; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.98.32 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <451cb301050531070737602bed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:07:55 +0300 From: McLone To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <751754961.20050531150559@rulez.sk> <20050531135850.GA90363@ender.liquidneon.com> Cc: Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: McLone List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:07:57 -0000 On 5/31/05, Brad Davis wrote: > > people use CARP for this, don't they? > No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers. CARP is for sharing one IP between multiple hosts/NICs. pfsync is for edundant PFs. Do yourself a favor, RTFM some. http://openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#CARP http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/carp.html --=20 wbr, |\ _,,,---,,_ dog bless ya! ` Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ McLone at GMail dot com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-' net- and *BSD admin '---''(_/--' `-'\_) ...sorry for translit