Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:23:40 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: LI Xin <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: whitelists clients still being greylisted Message-ID: <454E646C.31658.319E3BBA@dan.langille.org> In-Reply-To: <454E8C2A.8090301@delphij.net> References: <454E307D.9351.30D3616E@dan.langille.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Nov 2006 at 9:13, LI Xin wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > I'm setting up spamd with pf, and I'm finding that whitelisted IP > > addresses are still being greylisted. For example: > > Er? Have you mounted fdescfs as /dev/fd? I think this should be > documented. Hmmm, this is interesting... it is still greylisting that client. My rules look right: # pfctl -s nat No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled rdr pass inet proto tcp from <spamd-mywhite> to 64.147.113.42 port = smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 25 rdr pass inet proto tcp from <spamd> to 64.147.113.42 port = smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8025 rdr pass inet proto tcp from ! <spamd-mywhite> to 64.147.113.42 port = smtp -> 127.0.0.1 port 8025 # host 64.147.113.42 42.113.147.64.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer nyi.example.org. # pfctl -t spamd-white -T show No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled 12.152.184.25 66.35.250.206 205.150.199.217 216.136.204.119 # pfctl -t spamd-white -T show | grep 205.150.199.217 No ALTQ support in kernel ALTQ related functions disabled 205.150.199.217 # host m21 m21.example.org has address 205.150.199.217 # So why does m21 continue to be greylisted? For those wondering, I've changed the domain name to example, the rest is real. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?454E646C.31658.319E3BBA>