From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 26 00:04:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A2AAF5; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (lor.one-eyed-alien.net [69.66.77.232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B9BE1ACA; Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lor.one-eyed-alien.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s1Q04LX1081335; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:04:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks@lor.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: (from brooks@localhost) by lor.one-eyed-alien.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s1Q04LCi081334; Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:04:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from brooks) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:04:21 -0600 From: Brooks Davis To: Chris H Subject: Re: How to prevent use of clang && llvm? Message-ID: <20140226000421.GA80747@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <47ae4e8ed445c7e6fc46796d46b9a928.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47ae4e8ed445c7e6fc46796d46b9a928.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-hackers , freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 00:04:37 -0000 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 03:31:56PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > I'm in the process of performing an upgrade, and ran a preliminary check > to see what would be performed. During the process I encountered a > dialog(1) for both clang, and llvm3. It was for textproc/clucene. Which > wants devel/boost-libs, which depends on devel/boost-jam. I didn't require > clang, or llvm3 with the initial install of textproc/clucene (that I can see/recall). > But am presented with the dialog this time. I have WITHOUT_CLANG=true > in /etc/src.conf. Do I need to also add it to /etc/make.conf? Anything else? It looks like this is because boots requires a C++11 compiler and the default C++11 compiler is clang. From reading the source I deduce that FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc in your make.conf may achieve the effect you require. -- Brooks --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iKYEARECAGYFAlMNL4RfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1NUQ1MTlDMjZBNzgyRTcyNTI5OUJGMDVE OEU4QkU5RjIzODFBRDQACgkQXY6L6fI4GtQ64gCgis5V/JlVAGwPHLcWtc4M1Zak 2QcAoI97y70X6jpJPErTKRedURL56fIC =oQUp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--