From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Aug 21 10:19:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6351637B408 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 893F743E70 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:19:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 56779 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Aug 2002 17:19:49 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:19:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Jon Mini Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: timestamping kernel messages In-Reply-To: <20020821005414.GJ3751@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Jon Mini wrote: > > This would also give us a good architecture for hooking up > > ethernet consoles. > > Do you mean console over TCP? > > I'd really like to see gdb -k over TCP, and asynchronous, too. It would be > nice to only tie one kernel thread to a gdb process and not the entire > system. I'd prefer UDP since interrupts are disabled and thus TCP's timers would need to be polled. A couple of related messages: <15677.32896.256029.156431@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message