From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 08:13:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CEC16A4CE; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:13:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from blues.jpj.net (blues.jpj.net [208.210.80.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE7343D1F; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:13:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from blues.jpj.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blues.jpj.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i1CGDPm3079168; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:13:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from trevor@jpj.net) Received: from localhost (trevor@localhost)i1CGDPh3079165; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:13:25 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: blues.jpj.net: trevor owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:13:25 -0500 (EST) From: Trevor Johnson To: Eivind Eklund In-Reply-To: <20040212102842.GC3148@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20040212110623.A77057@blues.jpj.net> References: <200402110716.i1B7GH9D017803@repoman.freebsd.org> <1076508074.88428.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20040211122704.X93022@blues.jpj.net> <20040211165940.Q98525@blues.jpj.net> <20040212031228.E31447@blues.jpj.net> <20040212102842.GC3148@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Pav Lucistnik cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/firefox Makefile distinfo pkg-descrmkdistfile mozconfig.in patch-Double.cpp patch-build_unix_run-mozilla X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 16:13:07 -0000 > My opinion is that DES is right anyway. This lowers the consistency of > the ports tree overall, Not really--many other ports do the same thing. > and it makes it harder to do global statistics > etc. For each single issue this is not a big deal; however, overall it > IS, and to get overall consistency we need to make consistent choices in > each single case. > > At least 99% of the people that still run 4.6 and want to run firefox > will already have REINPLACE installed. The argument for "less > dependencies" is thus for an extreme minority case, and it is IMO not > one we should take particular care for anyway. We *want* people to > upgrade, so the net avoids exposure to old versions etc. Installing REINPLACE_CMD is not going to improve anyone's security. > My advice: Just accept the use of perl as a mistake, fix it, and move > on. It's a requirement for building the program. There's nothing wrong with also using it to edit a few files. If someone (you?) have ideas about removing the Perl dependency, that would be a really stunning enhancement to the port. As I said it's been a huge bugbear. -- Trevor Johnson