From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 23:02:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4152216A4CF for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:02:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D2743D2F for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 23:02:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:03:11 -0600 Message-ID: <40458319.1010004@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 01:02:49 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Sams References: <20040303064654.21529.qmail@web41208.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040303064654.21529.qmail@web41208.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2004 07:03:12.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[9794FF70:01C400ED] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make world question on remote dedicated server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:02:52 -0000 Mark Sams wrote: >Hi, > >I am thinking of getting a FreeBSD dedicated server >that I will only have ssh access to. What is the >normal procedure of keeping up to date with kernel >changes when you do not have console access? > >Is it possible to drop into single user mode remotely? > > No. At least, not from very far away, not with only one box. >Or is single user mode not necessary for make >installkernel and the like? Does: > >buildworld / buildkernel / installkernel >reboot then >installworld / mergemaster > >work while connected through ssh? > > > Yes. Quid pro quo ... this is more dangerous if the server is relatively highly trafficked. Also, if the kernel won't boot, you're up a creek. Hasn't happened to me ever, though. Now, there was that time when I forgot to tell BIOS to ignore the fact that no keyboard was attached ..... :-) >Thank you in advance. > >Mark > >