From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 26 19:30:11 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65F616A41C;
	Thu, 26 May 2005 19:30:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EA843D1D;
	Thu, 26 May 2005 19:30:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 989B6137B5; Thu, 26 May 2005 21:30:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:30:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050523023831.GC62971@dragon.NUXI.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0505262128470.25754@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <200505162031.j4GKVMOR038312@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20050521.144236.74702484.chat95@mac.com>
	<Pine.BSF.4.62.0505212152420.33827@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20050523023831.GC62971@dragon.NUXI.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc40 Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 19:30:11 -0000

On Sun, 22 May 2005, David O'Brien wrote:
>> However, I think we should see to use one of the regular ports in the 
>> future instead of having a special port just for the purpose of building 
>> OpenOffice.org.
> At the moment gcc-ooo has some needed patches that were rejected for GCC
> 3.4.  So we have no choice - unless we add the patches to the gcc34 port.
> I investigated doing that, but I wasn't comfortable with the changes the
> patches make to add them to gcc34 for general use.

Yes, in that case we shouldn't do that.  However, I wonder whether it's
really necessary to keep gcc-ooo as a port of its own instead of making
it a child port of the main gcc34 port which carries additional patches?

Alternatively, how about giving the gcc40 port a try?

Gerald