From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 17 13:26:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C00916A420 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D5B13C4CE for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0HCsIaT088391; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:54:18 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m0HCsIKE088390; Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:54:18 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:54:18 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein To: Tom Judge Message-ID: <20080117125418.GA88165@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <478F4EF2.7060209@tomjudge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <478F4EF2.7060209@tomjudge.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-net Subject: Re: Tuning of IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS for IP Multicast Sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:26:48 -0000 On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:49:54PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote: > On RELENG_6_2 the max multicast memberships per socket > (IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS) is hard coded in sys/netinet/in.h to 20. > > Would there be any problem with bumping this to say 40. The problem is > our VPN routers running quagga (ospf) seem to be hitting this limit. > > I know the problem is fixed on 7+ but would there be any adverse side > affects of bumping this value up? Not at all. I raised the limit upto 200 for my 4.11-STABLE quagga router 3 months ago and have no problems. There are 65 active now. Eugene Grosbein