From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 13:48:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAC8C8C for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE571BE4 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lbbuc2 with SMTP id uc2so44913299lbb.2 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:48:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Wft8pBGhAeHic+fpXdV+yHPdz5LK8KAkUHMJDzJ6rZo=; b=gIChdJ1DbBPDLAgSFDVAEWFu7iO1g/fceaicvmKwYHx3tqWUOj0iePrqwQ4vnWNlfR lf1mSgo/EB66v3B1qzutVqisdwrenhzD0SYqgRdxFLppyOkK6GTsjvkGbpYtzwhRRdbS RgtW4BLqb/s7Gp14XiQamRt7uC94ShCS3hdVs0lHevAmVGLNKlKMnIOsRCSktcHiFcnO 3uPZc6/PYGT7z3c3kT6FekbxQjHu1vetQcJzWC9/t5j5tOkbsyUcnxT3eIRJiYoJMMXq f8hN6niEq4lq9f6G9S0Gc/sNSeaJBkxh6sBItcDnBVmGkHeldzGVpW8VjBrKaVmQhRY1 r8PQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.29.180 with SMTP id l20mr3740813lbh.95.1430401719247; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:48:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.202.229 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2015 06:48:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <98E7D40A-EC37-413D-85CE-2A6012811E08@netapp.com> References: <5535945F.90504@swin.edu.au> <98E7D40A-EC37-413D-85CE-2A6012811E08@netapp.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:48:39 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Congestion Control Modification From: Karlis Laivins To: "Eggert, Lars" Cc: George Neville-Neil , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , grenville armitage Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:48:41 -0000 Yes, you are correct, I meant to write "relative OWD". As David Hayes put it - "Relative OWD measurements are easier, and clock drift is not usually a problem over the time it takes to send and receive an ACK". Thank you for the correction! On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: > On 2015-4-30, at 15:04, Karlis Laivins wrote: > > I have yet to solve the issue of > > how to get the One Way Delay for the ACK message (the time it takes ACK > to > > arrive from receiver of the ACK'ed data sender) correctly. > > That won't work without synchronized clocks, which you can't really assume > to be present. > > Lars