From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 8 18:43:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED4C106564A for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:43:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luigi@onelab2.iet.unipi.it) Received: from onelab2.iet.unipi.it (onelab2.iet.unipi.it [131.114.59.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80FC8FC12 for ; Tue, 8 May 2012 18:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by onelab2.iet.unipi.it (Postfix, from userid 275) id DD53A7300A; Tue, 8 May 2012 21:03:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 21:03:43 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo To: net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120508190343.GA72070@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Controlling queue delays X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:43:50 -0000 Here is a recent paper that revisits active queue management. http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2209336 might be interesting for those involved in TCP cong.control, traffic schedulers (ok, that includes me!) and the network stack in general cheers luigi