From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 4 18:27:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098A316A401 for ; Thu, 4 May 2006 18:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B94E43D48 for ; Thu, 4 May 2006 18:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [172.23.170.140] (helo=anti-virus02-07) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FbiYB-00056U-EW; Thu, 04 May 2006 19:27:43 +0100 Received: from [80.192.58.117] (helo=[192.168.0.2]) by asmtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FbiYA-0001y4-OC; Thu, 04 May 2006 19:27:42 +0100 Message-ID: <445A479E.3040700@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 19:27:42 +0100 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060305 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Schmehl References: <7C4B0DBB1010E81071B8F08E@paul-schmehls-powerbook59.local> <4459DC71.5080807@dial.pipex.com> <445A426D.50001@utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <445A426D.50001@utdallas.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with Broadcomm NIC - not recognized X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 18:27:46 -0000 Paul Schmehl wrote: > Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > >>> >>> It's working fine since I installed 6.1. The odd thing is, I >>> thought I needed the bce driver, but the 6.1 install detected the >>> NIC and used the bge driver. That driver is available in 6.0 as >>> well, yet it didn't work in that install. >> >> >> Why is this confusing? Drivers get updated to cover newer versions >> of chips which didn't exist or weren't available to the developer >> when originally written. If you really care then check out the CVS >> history for your driver from the FreeBSD site (developer / CVS >> Repository / web interface). >> > If I understand what you're saying, you're saying that the driver only > gets updated for the latest OS? That seems a bit absurd to me. > Wouldn't the bge driver be the same for every OS version that it's > available for? > Seems absurd to you; seems perfectly understandable to me. There is no such thing as "the bge driver". There are numerous revisions of a bge driver and each OS version has it's own revision that was current when the OS was released. That's what a new OS version is: updated drivers and core utilities. --Alex