Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 10:45:44 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: battery state Message-ID: <502B61B8.4040304@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BSv7FgSN=CkNwhzTa_caHA5gVvGZD8HZZ548Qubp_SAF_g@mail.gmail.com> References: <502B5F7D.6000909@bsdforen.de> <CAPS9%2BSv7FgSN=CkNwhzTa_caHA5gVvGZD8HZZ548Qubp_SAF_g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 15/08/2012 10:40, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>wrote: >> For a while now "acpiconf -i0" always shows the battery state that >> was correct when booting the system. It's never updated. >> >> snip > > It wont solve the problem, but does the sysctl hw.acpi.battery.time update > correctly? Thanks for the fast reply, right now it shows -1 (the system was plugged in during boot). I just unplugged it and it still shows -1: > sysctl hw.acpi.battery hw.acpi.battery.life: 99 hw.acpi.battery.time: -1 hw.acpi.battery.state: 0 hw.acpi.battery.units: 2 hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5 -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?502B61B8.4040304>