From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 29 20:18:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D083916A4CE for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:18:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862DD43D3F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:18:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B2A821C000C6 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:18:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 95F901C000C4 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:18:25 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050329201825614.95F901C000C4@mwinf1106.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:18:25 +0200 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <683485731.20050329221825@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4249AA86.2070107@makeworld.com> References: <42480F8B.1060405@makeworld.com> <1648629793.20050329122346@wanadoo.fr> <42496060.1060404@makeworld.com> <467487023.20050329162852@wanadoo.fr> <42496992.7020800@makeworld.com> <1805326777.20050329181237@wanadoo.fr> <42498D19.60209@makeworld.com> <813611053.20050329205032@wanadoo.fr> <4249AA86.2070107@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Anthony's drive issues.Re: ssh password delay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 20:18:27 -0000 Chris writes: > Be realistic Anthony - you know full well that if an item is not listed, > its not supported. But it _is_ listed. And "unsupported" is not synonymous with "doesn't work." > If' it's not listed - it's not supported - isnt that what MS drills into > its user base? Only if they call for support. Even then, they can still get suggestions, sometimes--but MS won't commit to anything on unsupported hardware. > You need to realize that you need to retire this whole thread. BTW - as > Ted asked, why are you NOT persuing this so rabbidly with Mandrake? I'm not that interested in running Linux. Linux is for kids. -- Anthony