From owner-cvs-sys Sun Apr 16 06:20:42 1995 Return-Path: cvs-sys-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA00138 for cvs-sys-outgoing; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 06:20:42 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA00129 ; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 06:20:37 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id GAA21818; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 06:20:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA00235; Sun, 16 Apr 1995 06:20:26 -0700 Message-Id: <199504161320.GAA00235@corbin.Root.COM> To: Bruce Evans cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-sys@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 locore.s In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Apr 95 22:39:39 +1000." <199504161239.WAA08936@godzilla.zeta.org.au> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Sun, 16 Apr 1995 06:20:23 -0700 Sender: cvs-sys-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >>With the new boot structure, numerous changes to the >>startup flags, etc, we more or less require people to update the bootblocks >>anyway. I don't think this is a problem. > >We should require this (now and in future), and remove all of the forwards >compatibility cruft from locore.s. Well, if they can no longer even boot the kernel, I think the compatibility code is now a little useless. :-) -DG