From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 6 01:10:10 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA24025 for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 01:10:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.2.144.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA24020; Tue, 6 May 1997 01:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from danny@localhost) by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) id SAA23498; Tue, 6 May 1997 18:12:21 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 6 May 1997 18:12:20 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" To: Mikael Karpberg cc: Archie Cobbs , current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: divert still broken? In-Reply-To: <199705060743.JAA25044@ocean.campus.luth.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 6 May 1997, Mikael Karpberg wrote: > According to Archie Cobbs: > [...] > > > So the choices are: > > > deny : be silent > > > reject: send ICMP !H > > > reset : send RST > > > Yeah, I think that's good. > That way you can configure it as you like. Flexability is (almost) always > a good thing. > > Would it be hard to add something like "netreject", which would send !N, too? That would be nice. I didn't suggest it only because I couldn't think of an appropriate keyword :-) Danny