From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 00:00:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5169316A4CE; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980CA43D1F; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2F809M5021996; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:00:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2F8094w021995; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:00:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:00:08 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20040315080007.GA21742@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Ruslan Ermilov , David O'Brien , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org References: <200403050147.i251l39I006593@repoman.freebsd.org> <200403042036.i24KaIeq025097@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040305141012.GA10639@ip.net.ua> <20040305143708.GA70192@nagual.pp.ru> <20040305152247.GB11063@ip.net.ua> <20040315001023.GP63585@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040315001619.GA1586@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040315065623.GA43263@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040315065623.GA43263@ip.net.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.24.0.6; VDF 6.24.0.55 (host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru) cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: David O'Brien Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils Makefile.inc0 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:00:15 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:56:23AM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Sure, but I think we should stick with what GNU configure would pick > if it was run with getopt_long() in libc, either FSF or our libc > version. There is no similarity in that point in ports. Some ports search for=20 getopt_long() (and got it from libc, of course), but some compile their=20 own copies in anycase. --=20 Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/ --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQFVih+JgpPLZnQjrAQGmrAP/Z+/0YG9zEjhMs2GvVMQKTOtcZ4wZnDgX KjjtaorFO6iLR/8s5syT8Z0JDCCkFuuzx6qZFzXLTqMts3vo1NOknCgsHJ5wPz1i 46KR16iG2xgsTXDi0OSFfHlWbEiLFy0TlQaOG1CzDf6gHS1RbR1LdkplpMUqCU9L qbxvnfAVDZU= =zgFm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--