From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 24 18:19:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D5C1065673 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@nitro.dk) Received: from smtp.fullrate.dk (smtp.fullrate.dk [90.185.1.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530C48FC13 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:19:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.4.24] (4304ds2-vlb.1.fullrate.dk [90.184.171.166]) by smtp.fullrate.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935549CE53; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:19:46 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" In-Reply-To: <20110124051644.GA70153@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 19:19:46 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <13F9D168-983A-4B78-A1F3-8B118F4C2DAE@nitro.dk> References: <201101200618.p0K6Inf4000743@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <4D386186.2070007@sentex.net> <20110124051644.GA70153@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> To: Peter Jeremy X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Matthew Fleming , current@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:19:50 -0000 On 24 Jan 2011, at 06:16, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, "Simon L. B. Nielsen" = wrote: >> Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of = cvsup-master instead if that makes it more useful? >=20 > Can cvsup-master still lose atomicity of commits? I suspect it can, Yes, there would not be a change in that - there is no simple way around = that with current infrastructure (as fixing that wold mean doing evil = hacks around cvs etc.) The only thing you would gain by using cvsup-master to pull sources is = lower lag time between what tinderboxes build and what's in src/ VCS. > in which case syncing directly off the SVN master would seem a better > approach. Better yes, but that's not a simple configuration change like switching = to using cvsup-master is, and unfortunately I have plenty of more = interesting projects than changing tinderbox code :-). PS. for other people not being Peter Jeremy :) - no, I'm not going to = consider git or going to consider discussing it - see above :-). --=20 Simon L. B. Nielsen