From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 20:36:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A8A16A423; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD94F43D45; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1AKas93055001; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:36:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k1AKasfA009334; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:36:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k1AKarLU009333; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:36:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:36:53 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Joel Dahl Message-ID: <20060210203653.GA9307@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net> <1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org> <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> <1139603433.954.29.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1139603433.954.29.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> X-OS: FreeBSD 6.1-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Ceri Davies , cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, John Baldwin , cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Giorgos Keramidas , doc-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:36:59 -0000 On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:30:33PM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote.. > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:12 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl wrote: > > >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer. > > > > > > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? > > > > > > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since > > > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different > > > types of commit bits? > > > > > > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit > > > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access > > > files. :-) > > > > No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in > > case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we > > don't know what this guy was working on''. > > > > It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names > > listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about. > > Yep, everyone who is in access.unclassified has the "unclassified commit > bit" comment next to their name in the SGML source, but I can understand > if some people were confused by the "unclassified" discussion, > especially if they believed that asami was the only one who had that > comment next to his name. :-) All that said, I would think that as a matter of principle access.unclassified should be an empty file. -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org