From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 16 06:14:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACB616A420 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:14:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (ns1.internetinsite.com [208.179.97.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F3643D49 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.internetinsite.com (localhost.internetinsite.com [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1G6EdXp052991; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:14:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by ns1.internetinsite.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k1G6Eckt052988; Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:14:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.internetinsite.com: chris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 22:14:38 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Maness X-X-Sender: chris@ns1.internetinsite.com To: Bob Perry In-Reply-To: <43F416D8.8060207@gti.net> Message-ID: <20060215221342.L52979@ns1.internetinsite.com> References: <43F360C4.6070201@chrismaness.com> <43F3FAF1.3060706@gti.net> <20060215213936.X45984@ns1.internetinsite.com> <43F416D8.8060207@gti.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stale Dependancy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:14:40 -0000 On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Bob Perry wrote: > Chris Maness wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Bob Perry wrote: >> >>> Chris Maness wrote: >>>> This might be Newbie question: >>>> >>>> What is the cleanest way to resolve stale dependency with gamin-0.1.5_3. >>>> I think I remember seeing a message that it merged into fam. I did a >>>> portupgrade -a, and it's still there. I was surprised this was not self >>>> cleansing because I used CVSUP to sync my port tree. >>> >>> Hi Chris, >>> I ran into a stale dependency situation where I thought gamin-0.1.5_3 was >>> replacing fam. I posted the issue and received the following command >>> which replaced fam: >>> >>> "You can only have one (fam or gamin) installed. The following command >>> will replace fam with gamin: >>>> > >>>> > portupgrade -o devel/gamin -f fam" >>> >>> I posted my message around 1/31. You may want to review archives and >>> determine if this may apply to your situation. >>> >>> Bob Perry >>> >>> >> >> That fixed the stale dependency problem, but didn't fam merge into gamin. >> Isn't that what caused the issue in the first place? >> >> > Not sure Chris. However, I did not see fam, or gamin mentioned in > /usr/ports/UDATING. > > Bob > Thanks, maybe I had it mistaken for another port that merged. Chris Maness