From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 4 09:04:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A170E16A420 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6E343D46 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 09:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:04:28 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Divacky Roman , arch@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9FC46F8F9925D46A00C61D8F@cc-126-240.int.t-online.fr> In-Reply-To: <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <20060302155625.37140.qmail@web32714.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060302160958.GA2035@flame.pc> <20060303082016.GA17730@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Subversion? (Re: HEADS UP: Importing csup into base) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 09:04:30 -0000 +-le 03/03/2006 09:20 +0100, Divacky Roman =E9crivait : | On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:09:58PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: |> On 2006-03-02 16:56, pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com wrote: |> > Hi; |> >=20 |> > I'm not wanting to be rude or anything, but is the idea of |> > moving to subversion at some point in time completely dead, or |> > is csup going to interact with it somehow? |>=20 |> ``Moving to Subversion'' is not really with us right now. On the |> other hand, csup and CVS are with us today, and are ready to use. |> I don't see why using or developing csup inhibits a potential |> future move to Subversion, if that's what you are asking. |=20 | I think that Robert Ollivier strongly suggested using mercurial as our | (possibly) next vcs, so if any move from cvs then to mercurial.. There is a http://hg.fr.freebsd.org/ which is kept up-to-date :-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold