From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Apr 9 7: 3:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1F5154FB; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 07:03:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA230636383; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:59:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:59:43 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, Chuck Robey , FreeBSD Ports Team Subject: ports cluster [was: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os] In-Reply-To: <199904090122.UAA52632@spawn.nectar.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 8 Apr 1999, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > It takes both ... Satoshi's environment catches errors in the ports > that I would never see on my machine. This is why I keep repeating > ``send-pr, send-pr.'' I am lazy. I'll do what I can to make sure > that a port that I maintain or touch works in as many environments > as I can see, but I can't/won't try everything that real users will. Satoshi, Is it possible for the ports-committer-guys to have access to the cluster for testing in a chroot environment, or is this too early in the development of the cluster tools? - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message