Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 10:18:19 +0200 From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r298187 - head/sys/netinet Message-ID: <3FA0A836-A54A-419E-B910-7B32BF934FF5@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20160503230336.GD1369@FreeBSD.org> References: <201604180638.u3I6cs5P043229@repo.freebsd.org> <1460992087.52955.47.camel@freebsd.org> <0BC0F7D1-9523-4FE6-A6ED-57372CC80206@freebsd.org> <20160503230336.GD1369@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 04 May 2016, at 01:03, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > Michael, >=20 > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:56:29PM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 06:38 +0000, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> >> Author: tuexen > M> >> Date: Mon Apr 18 06:38:53 2016 > M> >> New Revision: 298187 > M> >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/298187 > M> >>=20 > M> >> Log: > M> >> Don't use anonymous unions. > M> >>=20 > M> >=20 > M> > Why not? This is one of those commit messages that really needs = to say > M> Because the same code is used in a userland SCTP stack and that > M> uses C99. Anonymous unions are introduced in C11. That's why. >=20 > This explanation of course emerges next question :) > Why don't enable C11 when compiling the userland SCTP stack? Since this is used (meaning compiled) by other projects which have its = own constraints and which I don't control... Best regards Michael >=20 > --=20 > Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FA0A836-A54A-419E-B910-7B32BF934FF5>